Eero Saarinen - The Architect Who Saw the Future
American Masters Series
Eero Saarinen
The Architect Who Saw the Future
|
| St. Louis Gateway Arch — Eero Saarinen, completed 1965 |
A telegram arrived at the Saarinen office in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan in 1948. It was addressed to Mr. E. Saarinen — and for three days, the office celebrated. Eliel Saarinen, the great Finnish-American architect who had built Cranbrook and brought his family to America a generation earlier, assumed the telegram was his. Both father and son had entered the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial competition in St. Louis. Both believed the other had a real chance. When it became clear that the telegram belonged to Eero — not Eliel — the celebration continued, but something had irreversibly shifted. The son had beaten the father. The next era of American architecture had begun.
Eero Saarinen had one decade as his own architect. His father died in 1950, and Eero died of a brain tumor in 1961, at the age of 51, with five of his greatest buildings still under construction. In that compressed window, he produced the Gateway Arch, the GM Tech Center, the TWA Flight Center, Dulles Airport, the Yale Hockey Rink, and the Miller House — each one looking as if it had been designed by a different person. That was the central criticism of his career. It was also the central truth of his genius.
The Cranbrook Lineage
Growing Up Inside Genius
Eero Saarinen was born in 1910 in Kirkkonummi, Finland. His father Eliel was already one of the most celebrated architects in Europe — the designer of Helsinki Central Station, a masterwork of Finnish National Romanticism that married granite monumentality with art nouveau ornament. When Eero was two years old, Eliel designed and built a house in the middle of the forest, surrounded by woods on all sides. Maxim Gorky hid there once from the Russian police. Gustav Mahler played piano. Sibelius was a regular visitor. It was an environment of extraordinary creative density, and it shaped Eero's nervous system before he could articulate what architecture was.
The family emigrated to America in 1922 — Eero was thirteen. Eliel had been invited to develop Cranbrook, a 300-acre campus in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan that would become one of the most remarkable design institutions in American history. Cranbrook was not a conventional school. It was a total environment — architecture, sculpture, craft, weaving, ceramics — all disciplines unified under one vision. Eero grew up, quite literally, under his father's drafting table. At age four, he would approach the draftsmen and ask them to draw him a horse. Years later, when Eero was interviewing architects for his own office, he asked each one to draw a horse — because, he said, you can tell within two or three strokes whether someone really knows how to draw.
After Cranbrook, Eero went to Paris for a year to study sculpture — as his mother had done before him. He returned and enrolled at Yale, studying architecture. But the real education had already happened: in a Finnish forest, at Cranbrook's studio tables, watching Eliel work. The lesson was that design should be total. Environmental. Emotionally resonant. That a chair and a campus and a cathedral all belonged to the same act of thought.
It was at Cranbrook that Eero met Charles Eames, who had come to study under Eliel. The two formed a creative partnership that would define American design for a generation. In 1940, the Museum of Modern Art organized a furniture design competition. Eames and Saarinen entered together. They won — with a bent plywood chair that combined seat, armrest, and backrest into a single continuous form. The technology to actually manufacture it didn't yet exist. That was characteristic of both men: they designed ahead of the possible.
Frank Lloyd Wright visited Cranbrook. Eric Saarinen — Eero's son, who later made the documentary from which this post draws — remembers that Wright bounced him on his knee. The lineage was present, in the room, in person. But Eero was never Wright's student the way Lautner was. He was adjacent to that organic tradition, shaped by it, but moving toward something different: a sculptural expressionism that answered each building's program on its own terms rather than following a unified theory of nature and growth.
The Gateway Arch
St. Louis, 1948 Competition · Completed 1965
The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial competition in 1948 was the most coveted architectural prize in postwar America. Hundreds of firms entered. Eero Saarinen, then 38 and still working in his father's office, submitted a catenary arch of stainless steel — 630 feet tall, 630 feet wide — rising from the banks of the Mississippi. His design brief to himself was direct: an absolutely simple shape, the way the Egyptian pyramids are simple, the way the great triumphal arches of antiquity are simple. A landmark that would register from a distance and hold its meaning for a thousand years.
He made it to last. The Arch is a weighted catenary curve — mathematically precise, structurally self-explanatory. There is no decoration. There is no program beyond the act of marking a place in the landscape and saying: here. It is one of the rare moments in architectural history when a competition yielded something genuinely daring — something that looked like no building that had come before it and that still looks like nothing that has come since.
The Arch was not completed until 1965, four years after Eero's death. His second wife, Aline Louchheim Saarinen, oversaw its completion. That Eero never saw it finished — never stood under it at the scale of the built thing rather than the model — is one of the great biographical ironies of American architecture. He told the structural engineer, when they were standing together in the structure during construction: you know, if this thing falls down on my head right now, I will have lived a happy life.
One Decade, Many Architectures
The Solo Career, 1950–1961
Eliel Saarinen died in 1950. Eero, now forty, stepped out entirely on his own — and immediately inherited the General Motors Technical Center commission that had originally been his father's. GM wanted a corporate campus the way Cranbrook was an academic campus: beautiful, total, designed at every scale from the landscape to the door handle. The original Eliel scheme had aerodynamic curves and streamlined forms. Eero's solution was different: an austere, Miesian grid of glass and steel brick, with a stainless steel water tower as the campus focal point. He specified that the steel be used the way marble would be used in another building — with that level of care, that level of finish. It announced him as an architect of the first rank.
TWA Flight Center · JFK Airport, 1962
The TWA terminal at Idlewild — now JFK — is the project most people associate with Eero's name. It is a building about flight: about the desire to conquer gravity, about the drama of departure and arrival. The concrete shell rises and swoops like a bird in suspension. The interiors are continuous curves — no flat surface, no right angle. Saarinen's team couldn't draw the building before they built it; the geometry was too complex. They built large physical models first, then extracted the drawings from what the models told them. It was, as one colleague recalled, a particularly long and difficult process. The building opened in 1962, the year after Eero died. He never saw it open.
Dulles International Airport · Virginia, 1962
Where TWA was about emotion and image, Dulles was about problem-solving first. Saarinen approached airport design as a systems question: jets were getting bigger, gates were getting farther from the terminal, passengers were walking for miles. His solution — the mobile lounge, a ground vehicle that brought passengers directly to the plane — unlocked the entire architectural program. Because passengers didn't need to walk to the plane, the terminal could be a single compact building. The roof is a hanging concrete shell suspended between two rows of outward-leaning columns — one of the great structural ideas of the twentieth century. Eero called it a huge hammock suspended between concrete trees.
Ingalls Hockey Rink · Yale University, 1958
Eero sent people from his office to visit hockey rinks all over the country. They came back and reported: they're all horrible. Barns with ice in the middle. So he designed a single concrete spine arching the length of the building, with cables draping from it to support the roof on either side — a structural logic borrowed from his earlier Yale Hockey Rink work, then pushed further at Dulles. The Ingalls Rink was immediately nicknamed the Yale Whale. It looked like a beached Nordic longship. A hockey player who looked up at the concrete arch above him during a game was once quoted as saying it made him feel go go go. That was the intention exactly.
Miller House · Columbus, Indiana, 1957
Eero designed almost no private houses — he preferred buildings at civic scale. The Miller House in Columbus, Indiana is the exception, and it is extraordinary: a flat-roofed glass pavilion sitting lightly in an immaculate landscape designed by Dan Kiley. What Eero said about its design philosophy became a kind of manifesto: in any design problem, one should seek the solution in terms of the next largest thing. A chair in a room. A room in a house. A house in an environment. It was a principle that ran through everything he did, from the Tulip chair to the Gateway Arch.
The Furniture, the Collaborators, the Critic
Eames · Knoll · Aline Louchheim
The furniture is the architecture in miniature. Eero's 1956 Pedestal Collection for Knoll — the Tulip chair, a single molded fiberglass shell on a single aluminum stem — came from a desire to clean up what he called the slum of legs under tables and chairs. It is a sculptural object. It belongs to the same impulse that produced the Gateway Arch: find the simplest possible form that solves the problem completely. Florence Knoll had asked him if he had any new furniture ideas. He smiled, because he already had one.
Charles Eames remained a presence throughout Eero's career. Their early collaboration at Cranbrook — the bent plywood chair, the MoMA competition — had established a shared language of form-from-material that each carried forward independently. Eero named his son Eames. The friendship was lifelong.
Aline Louchheim was an art critic at the New York Times when she took the train to Detroit to interview Eero Saarinen in the early 1950s. She arrived to write a profile. She left having fallen in love. They married in 1953. Aline understood his work with a precision that matched his own ambition; she helped position him in the public eye, arranged the Time Magazine cover, and became an intellectual partner in the practice itself. After Eero died in 1961, Aline dedicated herself to completing what he had left unfinished: the TWA terminal, Dulles, the Gateway Arch, the CBS Building. Without her, the decade of work would have arrived in the world incomplete.
One Decade Is Enough
Legacy
The central criticism of Eero Saarinen was that he had no consistent style — that he was an ad man who gave the client whatever they wanted. The TWA terminal looks nothing like the GM Tech Center. The Gateway Arch looks nothing like the Yale colleges. The Miller House looks nothing like Dulles. His critics saw this as intellectual inconsistency. Eero saw it as honesty. Each building's form should emerge from its program, its site, its moment in time. To impose a single formal vocabulary across every problem was, in his view, to lie about what architecture is for.
He said: I feel strongly that modern architecture is in danger of falling into a mold — too quickly, too rigid a mold. Each building must have its own look. This was not relativism. It was a deep commitment to the idea that architecture is a problem-solving discipline before it is a style-making one — that the right answer to each problem might look completely different from the right answer to the last one.
Eero Saarinen was diagnosed with a brain tumor in 1961. Surgeons told him there was a one-in-ten-thousand chance of surviving the operation. He went ahead with it. He didn't survive. He was 51 years old. He had been his own architect for eleven years. Most architects don't hit their mature stride until their sixties. Eero's entire productive career was compressed into a single decade — and in that decade he produced buildings that are still among the most formally daring structures in the United States.
His son Eric, who made the documentary that animates this post, spent decades unable to process his father's death or his father's work. Making the film was the act of closure. He said: I forgive him for his genius. How can you not forgive somebody for being a genius?
"I hope that some of my buildings will have lasting truths. I admit frankly — I would like a place in architectural history."
— Eero Saarinen
American Masters: Eero Saarinen — The Architect Who Saw the Future (PBS)
Architectoid · American Masters Series
Eliel Saarinen → Eero Saarinen → Charles Eames
Comments
Post a Comment