Preserving John Lautner Homes
John Lautner · Lectures & Panels · Preservation
In 2011, John Lautner turned 100. The Los Angeles Conservancy and the John Lautner Foundation, with support from the Getty Conservation Institute, marked the centennial with a public panel at the 1927 Wilshire Christian Church — five houses, five stewards, and a question every owner of a significant modern house eventually has to answer: are you preserving the building as built, as the architect intended it, or as a place someone has to live in for the next sixty years?
The highlight of the afternoon is a single idea that Helena Arahuete — who worked at Lautner's side for more than twenty years and carried his office forward as Lautner Associates — makes unmistakably clear. It is, in my view, the closest thing on film to Lautner's own definition of what his architecture is for.
Preserving Lautner's Legacy: The Spectrum of Stewardship — Los Angeles Conservancy & the John Lautner Foundation, 2011, video courtesy of the Getty Conservation Institute
One Afternoon, Five Houses
Conservancy executive director Linda Dishman moderated: one house per panelist, five minutes each, then questions. The value is in the range of voices — two architects who inherited Lautner's problems professionally, two owners who inherited them personally, and Arahuete, who watched Lautner restore and upgrade his own buildings while he was alive.
Harvey Residence — Helena Arahuete
The Harvey Residence in the Los Feliz hills (designed 1949–50, though the centennial materials list it as 1951) was a mystery house — Lautner never discussed it in the office. When Kelly Lynch and Mitch Glazer were considering buying it, Arahuete found the original house entombed in unfinished additions that blocked its views; the restoration began with near-total demolition of everything that wasn't Lautner. She tracked down original builder John de la Vaux, whose memory of the 1950 construction still guided the work — the builders in Lautner's orbit are primary sources too — and was candid that the project blended restoration and upgrade. Her compass throughout: what would Mr. Lautner have done here?
Malin Residence (Chemosphere) — Frank Escher
Escher's segment is the intellectual core of the preservation argument. The Chemosphere was never completed the way Lautner wanted — cost cutting and sponsor donations shaped the 1960 as-built condition. So the hardest decision was philosophical: restore the house to 1960, or restore it to Lautner? After consulting original client Leonard Malin, the project architect, and the drawings, Escher GuneWardena chose intent over artifact: a slate floor per the drawings, walls finally paneled as drawn, frameless glass consistent with Lautner's mature work. Purists can argue any of those calls, but Escher's framing — that the as-built house was itself a compromised document — is the sharpest statement I know of the difference between preserving a building and preserving an idea.
Garcia Residence — Ron Radziner
Marmol Radziner's work on the 1962 Garcia Residence above Nichols Canyon, built for jazz composer Russ Garcia, dealt with the unglamorous side of stewardship: dry rot, failed waterproofing, insensitive additions. The most painful decision was the exterior terrazzo, which sat over destroyed waterproofing and was letting water into the house. They sampled until the new mix matched, rebuilt the waterproofing, and poured terrazzo that reads as identical — and Radziner was honest that replacing original fabric with a perfect copy still hurts, even when it's plainly right. The firm also secured the open entry stair with discreet glazing and matched the surviving colored glass panes.
Harpel Residence — Mark Haddawy
Haddawy bought the 1956 Harpel Residence — next door to the Chemosphere — heavily altered, including a 1978 second-story addition of roughly a thousand square feet. Demolition alone took three months. His approach was the purist's counterpoint to Escher's: the blueprints as road map, archival photographs filling in the rest, and the confidence that the decisions were easy because they were Lautner's decisions. Painted concrete walls were broken out and recast, the fireplace hood returned to its original finish, slider door handles reverse-engineered from molds. Willingly demolishing a thousand square feet of finished floor area is a decision most owners would never make; Haddawy names it as the project's only genuinely difficult call.
Rawlins Residence — Michael LaFetra
LaFetra's story of the 1980 Rawlins Residence on Balboa Island is the most personal: childhood summers walking past the only significant modern house on an island of red tile roofs, then, decades later, spotting weeds and closed curtains — and owning the house a month afterward. The structure was intact; the work was mostly systems and finishes, the burned-out passive radiant heating giving way to photovoltaics. Mrs. Rawlins wanted no kitchen — Lautner's first scheme obediently omitted one — and Lautner, thinking in decades, specified an elevator for clients still young, because someday they wouldn't be. LaFetra landmarked the house, then found himself unable to quite let it go.
The Space Is the Protagonist
Now to the reason this post exists. Twice during the discussion, Arahuete reaches for the same idea. The first comes when the panel is asked why modernist houses need more material replacement than a Craftsman bungalow, and she reframes the question entirely: Lautner hated the word "style" — he was after timeless architecture — and in a Lautner house, the house itself is the powerful statement:
“The spaces are the protagonists — the spaces and the views.”
— Helena Arahuete, Lautner Associates
Not the details. That's her contrast with the Craftsman house, where the hand-rubbed woodwork is the point. In a Lautner building, the details serve the spatial idea — and when a detail fails and gets replaced, the protagonist survives. It's a preservation argument, but it's really a design argument. She returns to it at the close, when asked why she's so passionate about this work: you have to physically stand inside a Lautner space to understand what it does to you — the space as protagonist, nature drawn inside, an effect so powerful she can't imagine anyone being insensitive to it. This is a person who spent more than twenty years across a drafting table from Lautner, and when asked to compress everything she learned into one thought, that's the thought.
I trained under Duncan Nicholson, who came up in Lautner's office during its final years and preceded us as architect of record at Sheats-Goldstein, and this idea ran straight through the lineage. But "the space is the protagonist" should not be misread as "the container doesn't matter." In Lautner's work the container is the embodiment of the space — shell and space conceived in a single act, which is why, inside the Chemosphere's octagon, you cannot say where structure ends and space begins. Wright, borrowing from Lao Tzu, located the reality of the building in the space within; Lautner made vessel and space one continuous thought. What Arahuete subordinates is the detail — but subordinate does not mean unrelated. Wright called it the grammar of the building: each house speaks a consistent language, and even the smallest detail stands in relation to the whole. So a handle, a fixture, a finish can be replaced and the protagonist survives — but only in kind, in the same grammar, which is why Radziner sampled terrazzo mixes until the new pour read as identical and Haddawy cast door handles from the original molds. The shell cannot be replaced at all — touch it and you touch the space itself. That remains the discipline in our office today: every decision, down to the smallest detail, tested against whether it speaks the building's grammar and serves the spatial idea.
Haddawy arrives at the same place from the owner's side: he didn't like Lautner's work at first because he knew it through photographs — and even Shulman's photographs, he argues, can't carry it. Architect and owner converge on the same conclusion: this architecture cannot be judged from images, because the protagonist doesn't photograph. It has to be inhabited. Anyone who has stood in the living room at Sheats-Goldstein as the afternoon light moves across the coffered concrete knows precisely what they mean.
The Spectrum of Stewardship
The subtitle is well chosen: Haddawy restored the as-built house with near-archaeological fidelity; Escher restored an intent the as-built house never achieved; Radziner replaced original fabric in kind, taking liberties only in service spaces that don't participate in the spatial idea; Arahuete blended restoration and upgrade, having watched Lautner do exactly that to his own buildings; and LaFetra acted first as a rescuer. The panel is also refreshingly honest about why these houses fail physically: nothing is inherently fragile about modern construction. Lautner and his contemporaries were experimenting with materials and waterproofing far less forgiving than today's, in pursuit of spaces nobody had attempted before; what kills these houses is deferred maintenance and unsympathetic alteration, not the architecture. A Lautner house asks more of its steward than a bungalow does. That is the price of the protagonist.
The closing question — name your favorite Lautner — is worth hearing in full: Radziner and LaFetra on the Stevens House, Escher on the Pearlman Cabin, Arango, and the little Walstrom House, Haddawy in tears at the Turner House in Aspen. Arahuete, fittingly, declines to choose: Lautner always said his favorite would be the next one.
 |
| Architect John Lautner — photo by Michael A. Moore, courtesy Lautner Associates |
The Panel
Moderated by Linda Dishman, Executive Director, Los Angeles Conservancy. Panelists: Helena Arahuete, Lautner Associates (Harvey Residence); Frank Escher, Escher GuneWardena and founding board member, John Lautner Foundation (Malin Residence/Chemosphere, 1960); Ron Radziner, Marmol Radziner (Garcia Residence, 1962); Mark Haddawy, owner (Harpel Residence, 1956); Michael LaFetra, owner and Conservancy board member (Rawlins Residence, 1980). Part of the John Lautner Turns 100 centennial program, video supported by the Getty Conservation Institute.
Related on Architectoid
Architectoid · Organic Architecture · Sullivan → Wright → Lautner
Comments
Post a Comment